My first read changed a little: i like that the smaller choices all lean toward the same mood. The image does not rush to explain itself. It rewards another look.
On another look, for me, the strongest choice is that the smaller choices all lean toward the same mood. It gives the image a little more space. It rewards another look.
Daniel Price
What stayed with me is this: small thing, but the image never rushes to explain itself. That was the detail that held my attention. The detail stays with me.
我反而会觉得,有一点不同看法:把情绪再推得更明确未必会更好,当前的整体气氛已经够完整了。 这个取舍比把效果做满更有意思。
@杜若川: 回去对照了一下,这个提醒挺有用。顺着整体气氛看下去,最安静的区域反而把整体串了起来会变得更明显。 换个观看顺序,判断也会变。
我反而会觉得,技术上当然很稳,不过我更喜欢细节都在往同一个情绪方向走这种不那么用力的地方。 细看之后会有一点后劲。
细看会发现,刚开始看的是主体,后来反而被观看顺序留下来。视线不是直奔中心,而是会稍微绕一下,这个顺序挺自然。 第一遍确实容易略过。
@许清越: 我会从另一个方向看:上面说得有道理,不过把情绪再推得更明确之后未必更好;现在细节都在往同一个情绪方向走留下的余地刚好。 换个观看顺序,判断也会变。 第一遍容易略过,停下来以后才会更清楚。 另外,画面没有急着解释自己也在影响前面的判断。
My first read changed a little: i like that the smaller choices all lean toward the same mood. The image does not rush to explain itself. It rewards another look.
停一下再看,说不上是哪一个大效果,反而是视线不是直奔中心,而是会稍微绕一下让我多停了一会儿。 如果放大看,变化应该更清楚。
换个角度看,文中提到“作品获得852次浏览、139次推荐,属于明星相关游戏广告风格的AI创作”,我回头看画面时能对上。尤其视线不是直奔中心,而是会稍微绕一下。 我最先记住的反而是这里。
@简书宁: 我会从另一个方向看:同一个细节我感受不太一样。视线不是直奔中心,而是会稍微绕一下让我觉得画面是在收着,而不是没做完。 所以我觉得现在这样就够了。
On another look, for me, the strongest choice is that the smaller choices all lean toward the same mood. It gives the image a little more space. It rewards another look.
What stayed with me is this: small thing, but the image never rushes to explain itself. That was the detail that held my attention. The detail stays with me.