I keep circling back to this: i like that the pauses between shots are allowed to breathe. The image does not rush to explain itself. I would not push it further.
On another look, the part I keep coming back to is how the pauses between shots are allowed to breathe. It feels understated in a good way. The balance holds.
The more I sit with it, small thing, but the smaller choices all lean toward the same mood. That was the detail that held my attention. I would not push it further.
I keep circling back to this: i like that the pauses between shots are allowed to breathe. The image does not rush to explain itself. I would not push it further.
我自己的感觉是,视线不是直奔中心,而是会稍微绕一下,这点比我预想的耐看。停几秒再回去看,观看顺序才慢慢出来。 停下来看的时候才会明显。
@唐予安: 这个说法提醒了我,我倒是先看到整体气氛,后来才注意观看顺序。观看顺序不一样,结论也会有点差别。 换个观看顺序,判断也会变。
@唐予安: 我补一个角度:上面说得有道理,不过拿掉中间那次停顿之后未必更好;现在快慢变化没有抢走主体留下的余地刚好。 这里不用急着得出同一个结论。
On another look, the part I keep coming back to is how the pauses between shots are allowed to breathe. It feels understated in a good way. The balance holds.
@Owen He: 这里我有点不同感受:前面说到镜头之间的节奏,我也有同感。不过第一眼和第二眼落下的位置不一样可能更关键,两点放一起看才完整。 这两个角度其实可以同时成立。 第一遍容易略过,停下来以后才会更清楚。
@Owen He: 我补一个角度:这个提醒挺有用。顺着镜头之间的节奏看下去,第一眼和第二眼落下的位置不一样会变得更明显。 我更偏向现在这个分寸。 这不是单独的效果,它和观看顺序是连在一起看的。 另外,快慢变化没有抢走主体也在影响前面的判断。
@梁景行: 我会从另一个方向看:我理解这个角度,但会稍微保留一点:动作之后留出了一点反应时间已经够了,再强化可能反而太满。 这点我之前确实漏掉了。
The more I sit with it, small thing, but the smaller choices all lean toward the same mood. That was the detail that held my attention. I would not push it further.
我自己的感觉是,有个小地方挺抓我:停顿没有被剪得太满。它不抢眼,但会把视线重新带回镜头之间的节奏。 这种分寸其实挺难拿。
换个角度看,标题把注意力引向了镜头之间的节奏,但画面里更吸引我的其实是快慢变化没有抢走主体。 换个观看顺序,感受应该会不一样。