For what it is worth, the longer I looked, the more I noticed that the quieter area ends up holding the composition together. It is subtle, but not accidental.
Noah Bennett
Looking at it again, for me, the strongest choice is that the image never rushes to explain itself. It gives the image a little more space. I would not push it further.
My first read changed a little: not the loudest detail, but the motion feels directed rather than simply fast. That is probably why it stays with me. That contrast matters.
细看会发现,有个小地方挺抓我:第一眼和第二眼落下的位置不一样。它不抢眼,但会把视线重新带回观看顺序。 停下来看的时候才会明显。
@余知行: 我补一个角度:这个提醒挺有用。顺着观看顺序看下去,视线不是直奔中心,而是会稍微绕一下会变得更明显。 这两个角度其实可以同时成立。
@余知行: 回去对照了一下,我理解这个角度,但会稍微保留一点:画面没有急着解释自己已经够了,再强化可能反而太满。 所以我觉得现在这样就够了。
@唐予安: 我补一个角度:同一个细节我感受不太一样。细节都在往同一个情绪方向走让我觉得画面是在收着,而不是没做完。 重点可能就在这个先后关系上。
说实话,有一点不同看法:减少边缘信息未必会更好,当前的观看顺序已经够完整了。 换个观看顺序,感受应该会不一样。 另外,最安静的区域反而把整体串了起来也在影响前面的判断。
For what it is worth, the longer I looked, the more I noticed that the quieter area ends up holding the composition together. It is subtle, but not accidental.
Looking at it again, for me, the strongest choice is that the image never rushes to explain itself. It gives the image a little more space. I would not push it further.
细看会发现,如果只保留中心区域,观看顺序可能更强,但整体气氛会少很多。现在这个取舍我能理解。 这个取舍比把效果做满更有意思。
My first read changed a little: not the loudest detail, but the motion feels directed rather than simply fast. That is probably why it stays with me. That contrast matters.
后来再看,观看顺序这块挺耐看。尤其视线不是直奔中心,而是会稍微绕一下,没有把效果一下做满。 停下来看的时候才会明显。
再看一遍,如果让信息更快被看懂,画面也许会更直接,不过现在这种处理更留得住。 这个取舍比把效果做满更有意思。
我自己的感觉是,技术上当然很稳,不过我更喜欢视线不是直奔中心,而是会稍微绕一下这种不那么用力的地方。 停下来看的时候才会明显。